![]() |
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
||||||
| Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamilton NJ
Posts: 197
|
i just installed an slp catback and want to buy an x pipe and was wandering if anyone has heard anything about the prochamber? thanx
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lubbock/Houston, TX
Posts: 909
|
The pro chamber will deff. liven up your exhaust alittle better than the X. Pretty much the same performance wise. If you got slp loudmouth, then it'll be :censored: Loud :shifty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Can you hear me now?
|
I had that combo on my GT. Here's a link to the exhaust vid I did. http://www.gotstang.com/profile.php?...=1&page=7#jump
__________________
![]() 2004 Black Mach 1 HP Twin 57mm turbo kit tuned by Modular Powerhouse 460rwhp/479rwtq at 7lbs with 10* of timing on a stock block
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
jjtgiants
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 3,731
|
I don't think you can go wrong with the Prochamber or SLP X......it just depends what sound you want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 900
|
Go with the X pipe. I had a friend put the prochamber on and it was disappointing.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
The Baninator!
|
psst...Prochambers are H-Pipes, not X-Pipes.
__________________
Chris "Shambles" Chamblee
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 900
|
I know the pro is a H, but the prochamber is crap. Modulars love X pipes and pushrods love H pipes. The only reason i had to take off my UPR X pipe and put an H pipe on, is because i had to widen the H pipe,and i couldnt' do that to the X pipe, due to a 5.4 install.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Traitor...lol
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 7,922
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
jjtgiants
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 3,731
|
Not sure how much I gained just from my Prochamber, but for sure it's not crap! I went with the prochamber because I wanted to save as much low end torque as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Beantown Stang
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,299
|
i got 02 gt with magnaflow catbacks and was also interested in the prochamber can u really tell the difference with the prochamber? and will u be able to hear it at high rpms?.. because once i get over 2500 with the magnaflows i cant hear anything..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
jjtgiants
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 3,731
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Beantown Stang
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,299
|
so u got the prochamber with cats?.. im talkin about the pro chamber without cats will that livin up my magnaflow catback?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
jjtgiants
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 3,731
|
I'm pretty sure it would liven it up the magnaflows a little bit. ....I just don't know how much. Look on www.mustangexhaust.com and see if there are any sound clips of that combo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
whos gonna ban me next?
|
if you go off road exhaust you wont lose power you moron. TRAVERS' drag radial car gained 22rwhp just from removing his mufflers. its a 4.6
__________________
2007 explorer limited procharged 2002gt sold new project: 427w c4 9" fox |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 900
|
Well after my friend installed his prochamber, we were ALL disappointed and then he took it off and bought an X pipe. I asked him about it and he noticed no loss in torque and loves the X pipe way more than the prochamber, and that's on his 2001 GT. So....i'll stick to my Opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
whos gonna ban me next?
|
hahahahahahaha
__________________
2007 explorer limited procharged 2002gt sold new project: 427w c4 9" fox |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Traitor...lol
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 7,922
|
Quote:
Now, to the guy asking about the magnaflows and prochamber, I have that combo, it will definately wake up the magnaflows, BUT prochambers LOVE a chambered muffler. It wont sound bad, but I miss my flowmasters but I really want some Mac's. We'll see though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Procharged
|
if you want to be cheap get the prochamber and get what you pay for..If you are willing to dish the $ that is worth it in my opinion..well you won't be dissapointed with bassani o/r x or slp o/r x.
__________________
2004 White GT just another Procharged GT. 401rwhp/407rwtq 8#'s in hot texas summer heat, built auto transmission. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
whos gonna ban me next?
|
show me where the fact is proven. the faster exhaust gasses are propelled from the engine, the more power the engine makes. if you dont agree, shoot yourself.
__________________
2007 explorer limited procharged 2002gt sold new project: 427w c4 9" fox |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Just becuase its cheaper, hopefuly it doesn't mean its crap. MT has mine on back order. It wasn't a money thing for me. I'm putting a o/r pro chamber on with my slp loudmouth 1s. I don't know how much louder its going to make it. It should be loud enough for me. Disappointing? I dont think thats going to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Designated Wingman
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ft. Bragg, NC
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
__________________
BBK coated LT's,MAC o/r prochamber, Flowmaster catback, UPR CAI, T-56 from 03 cobra, Spec stage 2, Steeda tri-ax shifter, Accufab plenum/75TB Polished. MSD Coils, NGK TR6s, Built 31 spline rear w/ 3.73s, H/R's and KYB's, 18" black bullits With 305 Nitto DR's and 265 555's upfront, FRPP Red Pony Brakes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Chris
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Yonkers, New York
Posts: 237
|
i have prochamber and loud mouth 1's and its loud as hell. Everyone stops and turns when I drive by, and people constantly tell me it sounds great and really loud. people hear me coming from 2 blocks away.
![]()
__________________
99 Mustang Gt, red 5 speed mac off-road prochamber, slp loudmouth I catback, BBK cai, Eibach Springs 3.73s, short-throw shifter, bbk 65mm throttlebody Ford Racing king cobra clutch, powerslot rotors Appearance: grill delete, 8 inch antenna, 03 Cobra Rear wing, Mach 1 chin spoiler, rearviews painted to match, smoked headlights, steeda cowl hood, 8000k HID kit, matching foglight bulbs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4
|
I just recently put on an offroad prochamber on my 99 gt and I found that I lost alot of low end torque. In fact it's so much of a difference, I am considering going back to the factory h pipe. Anyone else experience a huge loss in low end torque with an offroad prochamber? Is this the trade off for the louder sound?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 295
|
I have an O/R prochamber with flowmaster mufflers not the whole catback and i love it. Even before i put the flowmasters on there was a huge difference. It might not be as loud as SLP but it is very deep. Got a clip of the setup.
http://videos.streetfire.net/player....5-8C204D27AC74
__________________
![]() Sig by Slither 2004 GT: MAC O/R Prochamber H-pipe, Flowmaster 40's, Eibach Springs, K&N FIPK, MGW, FRPP 4.10s CarDomain |
|
|
|