Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.

Ignition Timing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-05-2005, 10:26 AM
keller2's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 44
Default Ignition Timing?

Has anyone noticed a difference in exhaust sound by advancing or retarding the timing?Also how should the throttle response be when changing timing?
 
  #2  
Old 11-05-2005, 12:07 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

There should be no difference at all, unless you are advancing or retarding timing soo much that you create problems.
 
  #3  
Old 11-05-2005, 01:08 PM
keller2's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 44
Default

My custom tune was supposed to have 4 degrees taken out for the nitrous tune, yet the exhaust seems very raspy on the nitrous tune and much smoother on the N/A tune.Also throttle response is much better on the nitrous tune.
 
  #4  
Old 11-06-2005, 11:37 AM
Chopper's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Parkersburg Wv.
Posts: 257
Default

Theoretically you would get a quicker throttle response but I have a Steeda timing adjuster and I couldn't tell any difference.My gas mileage did get better by two mpg's with + 3 degrees advance.
 
  #5  
Old 11-06-2005, 01:50 PM
keller2's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 44
Default

better throttle response from advancing or retarding timing?
 
  #6  
Old 11-06-2005, 02:49 PM
Chopper's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Parkersburg Wv.
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by keller2
better throttle response from advancing or retarding timing?
Advancing the timing.The only time you might want to retard the timing would be with a power adder.Supercharging,turbocharging,or nitrous.
 
  #7  
Old 11-06-2005, 02:59 PM
spike_africa's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orlando,Florida
Posts: 11,974
Default

retarding the timing will make the engine run ruffer if you retard it alot, so in simple terms yeah it can change.
 
  #8  
Old 11-11-2005, 05:03 PM
Lightning247's Avatar
Huge Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Charlotte/ Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 233
Default

Ideally, in a high performance application you want to run the least ignition advance possible. The only reason we advance timing is because of ignition delay. The problem with most stock cars is the spark is either not strong enough or the mixture is too poor to shorten up the ignition timing. The faster the burn rate the more complete the combustion. The quicker the charge burns in the cylinder the less time the advancing flame has to heat up the remaining charge, thereby decreasing the chances of detonating. If a strong enough spark can be incorporated it will increase the burn rate of the mixture in the cylinder, and require less ignition advance...which inherently decreases pressure rises on the compression stroke as the piston approaches TDC. Pressure spikes on the compression stroke equate to Negative power, therefore we want to fire off the intake charge as close to just prior of TDC as possible yet still have enough time to completely burn the charge. (5* BTDC - 20*ATDC completed burn would be ideal)...

Philip K.
 
  #9  
Old 11-19-2005, 05:51 AM
Chopper's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Parkersburg Wv.
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Lightning247
Ideally, in a high performance application you want to run the least ignition advance possible. The only reason we advance timing is because of ignition delay. The problem with most stock cars is the spark is either not strong enough or the mixture is too poor to shorten up the ignition timing. The faster the burn rate the more complete the combustion. The quicker the charge burns in the cylinder the less time the advancing flame has to heat up the remaining charge, thereby decreasing the chances of detonating. If a strong enough spark can be incorporated it will increase the burn rate of the mixture in the cylinder, and require less ignition advance...which inherently decreases pressure rises on the compression stroke as the piston approaches TDC. Pressure spikes on the compression stroke equate to Negative power, therefore we want to fire off the intake charge as close to just prior of TDC as possible yet still have enough time to completely burn the charge. (5* BTDC - 20*ATDC completed burn would be ideal)...

Philip K.
This is correct,I have dual plug heads on my Sportster and run with less advance (-5* I think) and got about 7-8 HP on the dyno.Thats just two cylinders,think what could be had with eight.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bobs0352
The Reference Section
1
12-12-2006 04:46 PM
Stevoneo
Modular 4.6L Tech
3
02-03-2005 10:48 PM
feerlss007
5.0L Tech
1
01-23-2005 02:04 PM
bgwillie
5.0L Tech
2
12-08-2004 02:46 PM
stangster8
5.0L Tech
2
11-03-2004 01:57 PM



Quick Reply: Ignition Timing?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:28 PM.