Mustang Forums

Go Back   Mustang Forums > Mustang Madness > General Tech Forum

General Tech Forum Use this form for tech related topics that relate to all/most Mustang platforms

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2008, 11:02 AM   #31 (permalink)
Must See
When In Doubt Mumble
 
Must See's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 1,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bassman97 View Post
That's not smart since our cars aren't designed for it. Hope you didn't corrode anything since E85 requires it's own tune and stainless steel fuel components.

As for me, 87 since that's what Ford says. 89 if I know I'm going to do some beating but that's it. 91/93 is pointless unless you engine is tune for it.

As for brand, Exxon/Mobil, BP/Amaco (Ford recommended), Valero, and Shell are the best. Getty is junk, haven't used Lukoil but gf says it's good, Sunoco is great but dirty, and Citgo is borderline. Anything else is a mixed bag.
Im pretty sure Jack was joking. I know he is not that dense.
__________________
Must See is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 11:06 AM   #32 (permalink)
SRQ
Florida Muscle
 
SRQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 134
Default

Damn...yeah we're at about $3.62 for 87 right now.
__________________
SRQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 11:28 AM   #33 (permalink)
Redrum
Senior Member
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Humble,Tx
Posts: 202
Default

i have a red stang too lol
i use 87 oct for my tune
__________________
2001 mustang with bbk intake,True Dual Flowmaster 40's,Rockford 10 inch Subwoofers T1 series with Memphis 500amp,DiabloSport tuner,underdrive pulley's.

SOON TO COME-procharger, j-mod,intake Spacers-Gears 4.10.
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 09:07 AM   #34 (permalink)
bassman97
blank
 
bassman97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 1,370
Default

That's good but unfortunately it wouldn't surprise me, which is sad. Some people are just, well...
bassman97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 03:05 PM   #35 (permalink)
BigDipper
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20
Default

No I didn't get a different tune.My car is slightly moddified (intake /exuast)The owners manual state's 87 octane for GT as well as the v6 , and 91 for the Mach 1.
BigDipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 03:11 PM   #36 (permalink)
3.8LMustang
Senior Member
 
3.8LMustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 520
Default

im using 93 octane, the gas is 3.69 right now
__________________

1996 Mustang
Aluminum Driveshaft , 1/2" Intake Manifold Spacer, 180 Degree Thermostat, SCT XCalibrator 3 Mustang X3 Power Flash Tuner, Port and Polish Upper Intake Manifold, BBK Underdrive Pulley Kit, Aftermarket Cold Air Intake, 3" Exhaust Tips, PYPES Stainless 2.5" True Dual Converter Back, w/o Cats, Pypes Street Pro Mufflers, Screamin Demon Ignition Coil, 10mm Livewire Spark Plug Wires (Red)

Last edited by 3.8LMustang : 04-29-2008 at 10:57 AM.
3.8LMustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 10:52 AM   #37 (permalink)
jjtgiants
jjtgiants
 
jjtgiants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 3,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 96TangerineBossGT View Post
It was only the cobras that came tuned from the factory for premium.

BTW, I run either BP/Amoco or Shell premium 93.

Scott
Mach 1's require 91 octane, which is premium in some states...at least Cali anyway....same as the Cobra I believe.

It cracks me up how many people think that if a stock car calls for 87 octane and you put 91 octane in the tank you'll get a performance increase.

Last edited by jjtgiants : 04-29-2008 at 10:57 AM.
jjtgiants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 12:12 PM   #38 (permalink)
96TangerineBossGT
Senior Member
 
96TangerineBossGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clayton, NC
Posts: 440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjtgiants View Post
Mach 1's require 91 octane, which is premium in some states...at least Cali anyway....same as the Cobra I believe.

It cracks me up how many people think that if a stock car calls for 87 octane and you put 91 octane in the tank you'll get a performance increase.
Yes I forgot about the Mach 1s (as I live in a 94-98 mustang world myself), but the point is that a factory GT is NOT tuned for premium.

I will say though, that I did notice a slight increase in mpg while running premium on the stock motor, but the increase was probably offset by the increased price. Also, when I tore the motor down to do my head/cam swap, I did not find any excess buildup or anything out of the ordinary. So, will it hurt anything, not likely. Is it worth it? Probably not.

Scott
__________________
96 GT
Mods: VT Stage IIs, Stage 2.5 Ported PI heads from New Kid Cylinder Head in Kansas City, PI Intake, BBK Plenum, BBK 75mm Throttlebody, BBK Fenderwell Cold-Air, 3.55s, Steeda Tri-Ax, SCT PRP Tune, FRPP Shorties, BBK Off-Road H, Flowmaster Catback, Steeda Adj./Quad., 180* tstat, Fidanza Aluminum Flywheel, McLeod performance clutch
96TangerineBossGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 12:54 PM   #39 (permalink)
MachGT
Senior Member
 
MachGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 635
Send a message via AIM to MachGT Send a message via MSN to MachGT Send a message via Yahoo to MachGT
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wombozi17 View Post
Black power

darn skippy!

I use 91 because that's the highest you can get in most places in Iowa... A lot of stations have 89 is the highest.

I've got reason to get the higher octane though
__________________
Gotstang??



2001 5-speed GT with a few personal touches

Quote:
Originally Posted by Napoleon
Ya ever take it off any sweet jumps?
MachGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 02:59 PM   #40 (permalink)
3.8LMustang
Senior Member
 
3.8LMustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MachGT View Post
darn skippy!

I use 91 because that's the highest you can get in most places in Iowa... A lot of stations have 89 is the highest.

I've got reason to get the higher octane though
damn only 91 octane, that sux man, were i am the highest is 93 octane
__________________

1996 Mustang
Aluminum Driveshaft , 1/2" Intake Manifold Spacer, 180 Degree Thermostat, SCT XCalibrator 3 Mustang X3 Power Flash Tuner, Port and Polish Upper Intake Manifold, BBK Underdrive Pulley Kit, Aftermarket Cold Air Intake, 3" Exhaust Tips, PYPES Stainless 2.5" True Dual Converter Back, w/o Cats, Pypes Street Pro Mufflers, Screamin Demon Ignition Coil, 10mm Livewire Spark Plug Wires (Red)
3.8LMustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 03:35 PM   #41 (permalink)
Archer1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 12
Default

In the May issue of Modified Mustangs Joe Dasilva says he's seen 05's, especially GTs detonate under load on 87 octane. So my next tank will be 91 octane. In the summer my Yamaha R1 will ping even on 91, so I have to be careful not to short shift it. No engine is ever going to be harmed by using too high an octane fuel. But if you don't need it you shouldn't waste the money.
__________________
05 GT Premium, mostly stock for now...
Archer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Ad Management by RedTyger

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48