Icefreezen Dyno
2 Attachment(s)
Ok got back from the dyno and not too impressed with the HP but damn look at that torque. I'm guessing the auto tranny sucked up a lot of the power and if you look at the temp. it was fudging hot as hell today.
|
you really cant complain man i mean you made 232 all motor figure like what 5ph for the 4.10 gears your right near 240 like i guessed. The nitrous numbers still bother me i dont know why it didnt do like 350-360, like i me and justin said this hot ass air really kills the cars power. still it pulls like a mother ****er doesnt it. but **** man your missing 18hp worth of nitrous hp. That still kinda bothers me. but the air/fuel is pretty good so thats nice.
|
No complaints on the torque numbers :banana:
|
Originally Posted by Icefreezen
No complaints on the torque numbers :banana:
Is your car tuned? That A/F ratio looks decent but it goes plenty rich on the top end. |
Yeah it was tuned today. I think the auto sucked up alot on top of the 90 degree weather today was the reason for the decrease in HP.
|
Originally Posted by Icefreezen
Yeah it was tuned today. I think the auto sucked up alot on top of the 90 degree weather today was the reason for the decrease in HP.
Did they have to fix the A/F ratio when they tuned it? How it look before they tuned it? |
horsepower sells cars.
torque wins races. |
at what rpm did you spray it at? I've seen lots of mustangs we've dynoed sprayed at different rpms and in the higher rpm area on a 100-125 shot you should be making 330-350. But then if you do like one guy wanted and spray it at 2500 you wont make but low 300rwhp and over 500 ft trq! Otherwise good numbers man.
|
Originally Posted by Blk02stang
at what rpm did you spray it at? I've seen lots of mustangs we've dynoed sprayed at different rpms and in the higher rpm area on a 100-125 shot you should be making 330-350. But then if you do like one guy wanted and spray it at 2500 you wont make but low 300rwhp and over 500 ft trq! Otherwise good numbers man.
You made a good point the guy tuning it said he wouldnt spray below 3000 so thats what i'm assuming. |
yea seeing he sprayed over 3k your numbers matchup good, what all mods do you have?
|
4.10's
Catted prochamber SLP loudmouth 180 thermo UPR plenum BBK 75mm t/b MAC CAI converted to RAI with a K&N filter 125 NX wet shot nitrous |
i can say for a fact that its fast n/a thats for sure. cant wait for my tune so i can be even mod wise again your ****ing tune huals ass.
|
well that and that fact you have 4.10 gears kinda helps too.
|
Originally Posted by spike_africa
i can say for a fact that its fast n/a thats for sure. cant wait for my tune so i can be even mod wise again your ****ing tune huals ass.
|
Ice, with your mods the numbers play out right even, congrats
|
good peak numbers but is the torque suppose to fall off that much? I'd think it would be a bit flatter of a curve then that.
|
Originally Posted by Icefreezen
Yeah it was tuned today. I think the auto sucked up alot on top of the 90 degree weather today was the reason for the decrease in HP.
If you payed for that nitrous tune, I'd be right back there today to demand a better looking A/F. You have a pretty mean lean spike and then your A/F dips to ~ 11 to 1. That curve looks like an untuned nitrous pull if I ever saw one:nono: There is a lot of power and safety left in that tune....you got much less than you payed for IMO. Jay |
Your N/A #s are identical to mine when my car was untuned! 230 something Hp & 270 something tq.
|
i hear debates weather steep gears make you dyno @ less hp . . but i dont know. Either way it should be pretty damn quick.
I'll have to make dustin take me to check it out when i come to o-town next time |
For those saying the a/f is bad, you must have great vision because the graph is really hard to see from the scanned version. It looks like the very bottom of the graph is a 10.0. If that is the case, hes not running nearly that rich.
Graphs can be deceiving....it is all about the scale you use. |
Originally Posted by MT's#1Customer!
For those saying the a/f is bad, you must have great vision because the graph is really hard to see from the scanned version. It looks like the very bottom of the graph is a 10.0. If that is the case, hes not running nearly that rich.
Graphs can be deceiving....it is all about the scale you use. BTW, I can see the graph quite well after using the enlarge feature. My old eyes can't see sh!t without it:wallbash: Jay |
12.6 1/4 mile no issues or chatter..so its a good thing
|
well he is running the wrong fuel jetting.
|
Originally Posted by spike_africa
well he is running the wrong fuel jetting.
|
Didnt you say in another thread that you were running a 125 shot?
|
Originally Posted by jeredan2003
Didnt you say in another thread that you were running a 125 shot?
|
Originally Posted by Icefreezen
Yes I am
:( |
Yor torque increase is 180.43whp......which is nice even for a 125 shot, But why do you only gain 107.39 peak whp? NX kits will put down 125 whp normally. :confused:
|
Originally Posted by jeredan2003
Yor torque increase is 180.43whp......which is nice even for a 125 shot, But why do you only gain 107.39 peak whp? NX kits will put down 125 whp normally. :confused:
|
You think your #'s are bad. I only got 100 HP from the 150 shot. But my TQ was 454. My NA #'s were 245 and only 345 on the juice. But it was hot and there was really no airflow in the dyno room he used
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:01 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands