the truth about CAI's
I see there's alot of people on this forum that seem to think CAI's alter A/F ratio . After reading everyone's reply's about CAI's I wanted to see for myself if there was a difference in A/F between stock & CAI's , so I got a few friend's together for alittle testing last weekend . I have numerous datalog files including STFT , LTFT & actual A/F ratio w/ WB . Datalogged 5 diff. cars , 3 '01 & later GT's , 1 '99 Cobra & 1 '92 5.0 LX . We tested stock against BBK style (end's right after entering fender) & also the one's that after entering fender make another 90 degree turn down . We found no change in A/F ratio , in any of the 5 car's we tested . and yes , I know LTFT is closed loop which didn't need to be logged for this test .
|
yeah, I remember reading that some people thought it hurt the a/f. but there's only so much air that can enter the engine without forced induction so there's no way any cai can hurt a/f
|
Originally Posted by rod04gt
I see there's alot of people on this forum that seem to think CAI's alter A/F ratio . After reading everyone's reply's about CAI's I wanted to see for myself if there was a difference in A/F between stock & CAI's , so I got a few friend's together for alittle testing last weekend . I have numerous datalog files including STFT , LTFT & actual A/F ratio w/ WB . Datalogged 5 diff. cars , 3 '01 & later GT's , 1 '99 Cobra & 1 '92 5.0 LX . We tested stock against BBK style (end's right after entering fender) & also the one's that after entering fender make another 90 degree turn down . We found no change in A/F ratio , in any of the 5 car's we tested . and yes , I know LTFT is closed loop which didn't need to be logged for this test .
Originally Posted by dannyb785
but there's only so much air that can enter the engine without forced induction so there's no way any cai can hurt a/f
that has no relevance, there's turbulence when the air goes through the meter so it ****s up the readings. |
Originally Posted by floppy
not saying i dont believe you but what were the mods on the cars? i definitely had a problem with the mac cai on my car, i could not drive in any gear below 2000 rpms, you know how some cars can just barely creep in first at around 5 or 10mph? well i couldnt. my car would start bucking. i had to give it some gas and let off and coast if i ever had to go that slow. in 5th gear on the highway (before getting gears) i had to be going at least 60mph or the car would run like **** because i was below 2k rpms. but as soon as i changed the intake i had no problems at all. the car rode perfect.
that has no relevance, there's turbulence when the air goes through the meter so it ****s up the readings. |
When I got my car dynoed, I have a BBK CAI, my tuner even told me that after the dyno it's possible that he'll want to take out the bend and just make it a straight shot because it WILL give a bad A/F signal. And I trust this guy. BTW my BBK was alright with the A/F, not everyone's will be bad, but it is known to happen.
|
Originally Posted by rod04gt
yeah , I should have named the title something else , I know it was only 5 car's & only 1 cobra & 5.0 , well it's not a 5.0 , it's been bored & stroked . the cobra has new engine w/ fr500 heads ported/polished/cams . My car was the least modified , the other 2 GT's had head work & cams also . It wasn't my intention for people to read my results and think they will have no problem , I should have made that clear in first post and named title something like "datalogging A/F w/ CAI's" . Out of all the posts I read I didn't see where anyone did any datalogging(I could have missed some thread's) and just wanted to test some car's to see what happened .
i dont have any a/f results to post, but i know my car drove like crap before. once i modded the intake i've had no problems. it's interesting to see that none of those cars had any difference in a/f ratio but another thing to consider is how long they've had the cai on the car. if you put one on the car and drive around for a while the computer learns and tries to compensate for things like that. if you have a chance to dyno your car again try resetting the battery and running the dyno immediately before it can learn and adjust. that will give you a more accurate reading of what the cai is really doing to the a/f ratio. |
Originally Posted by floppy
i dont have any a/f results to post, but i know my car drove like crap before. once i modded the intake i've had no problems. it's interesting to see that none of those cars had any difference in a/f ratio but another thing to consider is how long they've had the cai on the car. if you put one on the car and drive around for a while the computer learns and tries to compensate for things like that. if you have a chance to dyno your car again try resetting the battery and running the dyno immediately before it can learn and adjust. that will give you a more accurate reading of what the cai is really doing to the a/f ratio.
the a/f ratio was a little different from car to car , gt's were just about the same. we did reset PCM before each logging . |
I DID DEFINATELY have problems with the a/f ratio with the bend. This thread is BS. :icon_bs:
|
Originally Posted by jeredan2003
I DID DEFINATELY have problems with the a/f ratio with the bend. This thread is BS. :icon_bs:
thats exactly what i said... i definitely had problems. |
Same here.......My car is running way cleaner than it did before
|
So if you had trouble with your CAI, then what did you do to fix the problem, anyone with JLT have A/F problems?
|
Originally Posted by 9COILEDSERPENT6
So if you had trouble with your CAI, then what did you do to fix the problem, anyone with JLT have A/F problems?
I've never heard of anyone having problems with the JLT's. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:54 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands