Videos Have a video? Come share it in here.

Stang v/s iroc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-20-2004, 08:17 PM
rebelyell's Avatar
More Cowbell
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,003
Default Stang v/s iroc

Here's one I found of street race. Hard to tell who won this
 
  #2  
Old 11-24-2004, 10:37 AM
MustangV6's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Alexandria Bay, NY
Posts: 55
Default

hard to tell might look like the stang is ahead by a little bit but cant really tell
 
  #3  
Old 11-24-2004, 04:31 PM
TayWolf55's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ozark, MO
Posts: 597
Default

I hate those, always impossible to tell who wins. Nice video though.
 
  #4  
Old 11-24-2004, 06:40 PM
my2001GT's Avatar
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 161
Default

I actually saw somthin very similar... In person....

Mustang spanked it though... good match up though both light and quick cars..
just my 2 cents
 
  #5  
Old 11-28-2004, 12:33 PM
dsg_gt2004's Avatar
Booty Master
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: georgetown,sc
Posts: 395
Default

pointless:would have been nice if someone said who won..or what mods the two had
 
  #6  
Old 12-19-2004, 09:39 AM
Poonstangs's Avatar
Bizzo
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego, Cali
Posts: 35
Default

those IROCS are waaaayyyyy over weight and underpowered....
 
  #7  
Old 12-19-2004, 10:11 AM
02wt5sp's Avatar
rice..it'swhat'sfordinner
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: hampton va
Posts: 324
Default

yeah, he's right, I'd like to see the mods on both, cuz stock IROCs are lucky to beat v6 stangs
 
  #8  
Old 12-19-2004, 12:16 PM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

The fastest of the IROCs were 14.2 in the 1/4 stock and I believe it was the 89. They really didnt have all that much HP for the size of the engine. Same thing with the 6.6l transam. They had, what, 200HP?
 
  #9  
Old 12-23-2004, 07:50 PM
gtnumber2's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 289
Default

i had a iroc and they were slow. that might have been a 350.
 
  #10  
Old 12-24-2004, 01:22 PM
Poonstangs's Avatar
Bizzo
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego, Cali
Posts: 35
Default

Originally Posted by MattJ
The fastest of the IROCs were 14.2 in the 1/4 stock and I believe it was the 89. They really didnt have all that much HP for the size of the engine. Same thing with the 6.6l transam. They had, what, 200HP?
low compression owned those maros...
 
  #11  
Old 01-20-2005, 08:42 PM
1-fast-02-gt's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6
Default

Ya weight is a big prob on the iroc's...a little addition MattJ your car looks great!!
 
  #12  
Old 01-21-2005, 06:17 PM
ModMotorRacer's Avatar
Modular Misfit
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 329
Default

That was a 91/92 Camaro....I don't know who won but I can tell you which car is faster. Stang got whooped off the line because it actually has the power to spin the tires..... :thumbsup:


Adam
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
98 STANG
V6 Tech Forums
1
06-01-2010 03:51 PM
lanmas23
The Lounge
6
11-21-2006 08:36 AM
TClark22
Videos
4
10-20-2006 03:53 PM
cobra4123
Pictures
9
05-19-2005 03:24 AM



Quick Reply: Stang v/s iroc



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:27 AM.