Mustang Forums

Go Back   Mustang Forums > Mustang Madness > Modular 4.6L Tech

Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-29-2004, 11:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
stang5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Reno NV
Posts: 27
Send a message via AIM to stang5
Default Running rich on O/R pipes

I'm sure you guys with o/r pipe notice that raw fuel smell when your car is idling, is there any negative effect this may have on the engine? I dont want to get a tune yet until I get my T/B and plenum installed.
__________________
02 GT 5 speed N/A
262 RWHP-300 RWTRQ
stang5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2004, 04:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
WaterDR
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,363
Default

Welcome to the world of no cats! That odor is the smell of pullutants leaving your exhaust system that are not being scavenged by the cats since they are not there. I asuume that is what you have noticed and it is normal.
__________________


Black 2000 GT Vert:
Novi-2000 with Intercooler (375rwhp @ 9 psi); Tune by Kauffmans; Roush 380R Body kit; Steeda Subframes; Steeda Strut Tower Support; Deep Dish Bullets; FRPP 4:10's; SCT 4 Position Chip with four custom tunes; Steeda CAI; C&L Pleum; BBK 75 TB; SLP Loudmouth; SLP Catted X-Pipe; Bullitt Suspension; UPR Conrol Arms; Focus Fuel Pump

My Car

My Email
WaterDR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2004, 08:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
stang5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Reno NV
Posts: 27
Send a message via AIM to stang5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT's#1Customer!
Welcome to the world of no cats! That odor is the smell of pullutants leaving your exhaust system that are not being scavenged by the cats since they are not there. I asuume that is what you have noticed and it is normal.
..

But by not havings cats it's not causing the engine to run richer at all?
__________________
02 GT 5 speed N/A
262 RWHP-300 RWTRQ
stang5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2004, 08:53 PM   #4 (permalink)
madmatt
Traitor...lol
 
madmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 7,911
Default

In theory it shouldnt, because you havent made it pump more fuel, it just doesnt get captured by the cats.
__________________


madmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2004, 09:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
WaterDR
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,363
Default

I think this whole rich vs lean debate will go on for years with newer cars.

As a general rule, most intake and exhaust mods tend to cause some leaning of the a/f and not a rich condition. The only mods that I can think of that will make the car run rich is Long Tube Headers and larger fuel injectors when the MAF is not calibrated for them.

Here is a basic lesson on how the closed-loop fuel system works:

The Mustang's computer is coded with different fuel trims depending on operating conditions. These conditions are based on such things such as engine temperature. For example, when the motor is cold, the car will run rich...on purpose.

The 02 sensors (there are four I believe) are constantly being monitored. The forward bank which is just before the cats is critical to the function of the car. The 02 sensors read the a/f and send a voltage signal that is interpreted by the ECU. The ECU then determines if more or less fuel needs to be added. It is really A LOT more complicated than that, but this is a real simple explanation. As a result, the car is able to compensate quite a bit for the typical bolt-on mods.

Messing with the Mass Air Flow Meter (MAF) can really screw things up big time. If not done right, you can ruin an engine. The ECU gets important data from the MAF.

I guess what I am trying to convinve you of is that the odor that you detect is the result of not having cats and is not from a rich condition. HOWEVER, the car could be running rich also, but not because of not having cats.
__________________


Black 2000 GT Vert:
Novi-2000 with Intercooler (375rwhp @ 9 psi); Tune by Kauffmans; Roush 380R Body kit; Steeda Subframes; Steeda Strut Tower Support; Deep Dish Bullets; FRPP 4:10's; SCT 4 Position Chip with four custom tunes; Steeda CAI; C&L Pleum; BBK 75 TB; SLP Loudmouth; SLP Catted X-Pipe; Bullitt Suspension; UPR Conrol Arms; Focus Fuel Pump

My Car

My Email
WaterDR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2004, 10:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
stang5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Reno NV
Posts: 27
Send a message via AIM to stang5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MT's#1Customer!
I think this whole rich vs lean debate will go on for years with newer cars.

As a general rule, most intake and exhaust mods tend to cause some leaning of the a/f and not a rich condition. The only mods that I can think of that will make the car run rich is Long Tube Headers and larger fuel injectors when the MAF is not calibrated for them.

Here is a basic lesson on how the closed-loop fuel system works:

The Mustang's computer is coded with different fuel trims depending on operating conditions. These conditions are based on such things such as engine temperature. For example, when the motor is cold, the car will run rich...on purpose.

The 02 sensors (there are four I believe) are constantly being monitored. The forward bank which is just before the cats is critical to the function of the car. The 02 sensors read the a/f and send a voltage signal that is interpreted by the ECU. The ECU then determines if more or less fuel needs to be added. It is really A LOT more complicated than that, but this is a real simple explanation. As a result, the car is able to compensate quite a bit for the typical bolt-on mods.

Messing with the Mass Air Flow Meter (MAF) can really screw things up big time. If not done right, you can ruin an engine. The ECU gets important data from the MAF.

I guess what I am trying to convinve you of is that the odor that you detect is the result of not having cats and is not from a rich condition. HOWEVER, the car could be running rich also, but not because of not having cats.
what about a throtle body and plenum upgrade? would the computer be able to compensate from the extra air the engine is ingesting? I still have the stock MAF That I dont plan on touching. I'm kinda hesitant to do the T/B and plenum upgrade right now without a tune, that it might cause a very lean condition. Thanks for the info.
__________________
02 GT 5 speed N/A
262 RWHP-300 RWTRQ
stang5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2004, 02:00 AM   #7 (permalink)
WaterDR
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,363
Default

I think that if you had a complete exhaust (stock headers), CAI, TB, and Plenum upgrades you will run leaner than stock but should be just fine for an n/a application. The Mustangs come a little rich from the factory and you can lean then up about 20% or so (maybe more) w/o a problem. This little bit of leaning will actually improve hp and fuel economy.

This is how my car is modified plus a chip. I have not had it on a dyno, but I did have a C&L MAF Kit at one time and was running too lean. As soon as the weather warmed up, I was getting missfire codes. I had a Ford Tech put it on the computer and the fuel injectors were trying to compensate by 30% (the max) and it was still running so lean that I was having missfires. Removing the MAF Kit and returning to stock, corrected the problem.

I have plans to have my car dynoed in October as I need to have my nitrous application checked out. I will be sure to post my numbers.
__________________


Black 2000 GT Vert:
Novi-2000 with Intercooler (375rwhp @ 9 psi); Tune by Kauffmans; Roush 380R Body kit; Steeda Subframes; Steeda Strut Tower Support; Deep Dish Bullets; FRPP 4:10's; SCT 4 Position Chip with four custom tunes; Steeda CAI; C&L Pleum; BBK 75 TB; SLP Loudmouth; SLP Catted X-Pipe; Bullitt Suspension; UPR Conrol Arms; Focus Fuel Pump

My Car

My Email
WaterDR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2004, 05:03 AM   #8 (permalink)
madmatt
Traitor...lol
 
madmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 7,911
Default

Great info as always man. Thanks for clearing some of that up for me.
__________________


madmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new suspension installed zigzaggthefag321 Pictures 19 07-24-2006 07:06 AM
MGW or Steeda jstn0127 Modular 4.6L Tech 15 05-27-2006 08:25 AM
Locking Lug Nuts Picture? pepsiaddict AmericanMuscle 2 05-13-2006 07:35 AM
Times with PI swap OFFdutyHERO Modular 4.6L Tech 2 01-14-2006 12:57 PM
Tail light tint question? DarkSith The Lounge 17 10-24-2005 12:19 PM



Ad Management by RedTyger

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48