![]() |
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
||||||
| Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 88
|
or whatever WHP to equate to that bhp (dumb guy here--dont hate). right now i have LT, hpipe with cats, catback, chip (93octane), kn air filter (hehe)...
basic bolt ons? i have a 99gt 5speed. would i get there if I add cam only with what i have on now?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
DSG!!!
|
to get you at 300 in the engine you'd probably just need a few more bolt ons.. with SLP LT's, SLP O/R X-pipe, Steeda cat-back, Steeda CAI, Accufab 75mm TB and Plenum, and with an SCT Xcal2 tune I had 270rwhp.. which is probably close to 300 in the engine
__________________
![]() CAP DSG Registry 2003 Mustang GT - daily driven check out my cardomain for more info 296 rwhp / 310 rwtq Money spent @ AM: $4623.20 1984 Mustang Hatch - low budget project |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
A nice cam setup, and a port and polish and I wouldnt be suprised if you are there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 88
|
thanks fellas
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Wowbagger hates me too!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 6,702
|
you need to be making at least 255rwhp for a 5 speed and 240 for an auto. Those are representative of 15 and 20% driveline losses to 300bhp.
I made 244rwhp with just exhaust and a TB&CAI s 300bhp isn't out of the question with bolt ons. 300rwhp requires a substantial investment with P&P heads and new cams and springs. At that point you're trying to get over 355bhp from a 281cid motor... not the easiest thing to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
|
you can do it with full bolt on's and some aggresive cams. Its been done a few times only on stick cars not auto's.
__________________
Dustin 2002 GT Mustang 5-Speed Drag Radials,Sprayed,Powershifted ![]() ![]() WOOO HOOOO! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
.
__________________
-Will ![]() 12s OR BUST!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
jjtgiants
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 3,674
|
You can probably get pretty close with cams......You know, I think I'm going to quit telling people my rwhp and go with flywheel cause it sounds a lot better! ha ha ha......plus when random people ask at the gas station "how much hp do you have" they probably won't understand the difference between RWHP and flywheel anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Wowbagger hates me too!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Magrathea/California
Posts: 6,702
|
damn shaggy.. that's nice numbers from a bolt-on car. mooey bwaynoh!
I made 232 bone stock down to the air filter, 244 with a minimum of mods. We did a lot of tune work on my car at one point but the Diablo Revolutions software was new at the time and we couldn't get a tune to return repeatable results. An SCT tune gained me 6rwhp and 4tq so I thought, why bother. nearly 500 bucks for a good dyno tune and chip ... naw, not until the blower and nitrous come on line this spring. We could have gotten much more aggressive on the tune but I beat my car so again, why bother. P&P heads and some cams may join the blower but we'll see how the finances line up. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|