The Lounge This is the General Talk forum.

Ford Modular ¼ mile ET Quick list all time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-11-2011, 02:29 PM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default Ford Modular ¼ mile ET Quick list all time

Ford Modular ¼ mile ET Quick list all time, feel free to add more if you know of any: updated 5.11.2011

1. John Mihovetz (Accufab) - 6.193 @ 235 - ( Mustang TUBE CHASSIS, 4V 4.6, LENCO – TWIN TURBO )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86uLwXstuWQ&feature=player_embedded

2. Gary Soulages - 6.93 @ 209 - 283ci 76mmTT – Truck http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oROLe_Ns590

3. MMR – 6.991 @ 205 - (Not a Chassis Car) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYAVHiEKdYg

4. JR Granatelli - 7.27 @ 190.00 - ( MUSTANG TUBE CHASSIS 5.4 4V LENCO - TURBO )

5. Jason Wilkerson - 7.49 @ 177 - 330ci TT - Truck

6. Andy Manson – 7.625 @ 181 - 4.6 325ci superchargerd combo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOvEn...ature=youtu.be

7. Joey Bridge – 7.73 @ 186 - (5.4L - Single Turbo - 3200 lbs - Glide - 275's - stock suspension)

8. Manny (HPP Racing) – 7.78 @ 181 - ( 4.6 Stroker 1999 COBRA GLIDE – SINGLE 98MM TURBO )

9. Triangle Speed – 7.80 @ 181

10. Dana Cook 7.85 @ 177.35 - MMR built TT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcCmxgDONbc&feature=youtu.be

11. TOXIC281 – 7.89 @ 176

12. Evolution Performance - 7.89 @ 175 - TT 5.4 (Not a Chassis car) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KMxv-lu_Wk

13. Dave Guy (viperred96gy) – 7.91 @ 182

14. Eric Leeper – 7.93 @ 175 - 331ci TT – Truck

15. Andrew “Junker” Barrale 7.95 @ 174.3 - 4.6 F1-R 3375# Mustang

16. Randy Haywood - 7.97 @ 188.00 - ( 4V 5.4 POWER GLIDE - TURBO )

17. John Kolivas – 7.99 @ 180

18. Bridge Racing - 7.99 @ 176 - (4.6L - GT4788 - glide - Stock suspension)

19. Mark Luton - 8.02 @ 176 - 5.4 turbo Stock Suspension

20. Johnny “Lightning” Wiker - 8.02 @ 169 - 358ci TT – Truck

21. MMR - 8.02 @ 176 - 5.4 single stock Suspension

22. LoProRaceCars - 8.15 @ 176

23. Bart Tobener – 8.15 @ 170.58 – 336ci – 4v with V7 YSi-Trim (Krugan Performance)

24. Carl Tasca – 8.18 @ 167.74 - 1.27/60’ 2010CJ

25. Ronnie Diaz - 8.18 @ 165mph - NMRA #6 1999 Mustang GT 4V

26. Brian Tutten - 8.20 @ ??

27. Greg1320 (racers edge) - 8.24 @ 170 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3NxV7d_OM4

28. Steve Cooper - 8.30 @ 162 mph - (Accufab Engine, Whipple 3.4, Lightning)

29. Tim Palmer - 8.30 @ 162.00 - ( 1998 COBRA - TURBO )

30. Dave King - 8.32 @ 168 - ( 1997 COBRA POWER GLIDE - F2M )

31. blownstang01 - 8.39 @ 166

32. ninesecsnake - 8.40 @ 173

33. Vinny Barber - 8.44 @ 164

34. Allgo - 8.47 @ 163

35. Robert Fortin - 8.46 @ 165 - JPC Built Twin 67 mm 3600#s 3v

36. Roy Hill 8.47 @ 161 - Ford Racing 2010 Cobra Jet EngineJDM Engineering

37. Chris Crown - 8.47 @ 160.00 - ( 2000 GT PG - TURBO )

38. Justin Burcham – 8.48 @ 165 - 322ci 3 Valve Mustang 3605#s

39. Bob Cook – 8.48 @ 162 – 302ci – 4v with V7 YSi-Trim

40. Dominic Gabriel – 8.50 @ 170 – 298ci Livernois Stroker 4V in a Fox Body

41. Eddie Rios - 8.501 @163.8 - Single GT47-80, TH400, 2000 mustang GT 281" 4V

42. ModMont - 8.52 @ 162 – 323” 3v FR1

43. Jason Borum 8.52 @ 162 – 281 – 4v - Twin 67mm Trubos Fox Body Coupe

44. Bob Trinanes - 8.56 @ 170.00 - ( COBRA - PAXTON, COG DRIVE, HOGAN INTAKE, SP )

45. Aaron Archer - 8.57 @ 160.00 - ( 2003 COBRA C4 - BLOWER )

46. Reggie Burnett - 8.60 @ 159

47. Daniel Akre (2v mmr engine) - 8.60 @ 160

48. Shawn Byrne - 8.62 @ 163 – Turbo 2 Valve 1999 GT

49. Frank Yee – 8.65 @ 158.89 03 - Cobra

50. Jack Pedro 8.67 @ 160 - 4V Turbo

51. Joe Stewart - 8.70 @ 160.00 - ( 1998 COBRA - PAXTON, COG DRIVE, HCI LOWER, SP )

52. JRS Blown Snake - 8.72 @ 154.04 - w/ 1.25, 60 foot / (Blower only. 3.4 Whipple)

53. Jason Shaw - 8.85 @ 155

54. Turbo Cobra – 8.85 @ 155 - (GT4780)

55. Casey Brown – 8.87 @ 151 - 331ci 67mm TT

56. Evolution - 8.89 @ 159.81 – Stock GT500 engine with Twin Turbos (08/09/08 Atco Racway)

57. Evolution 2011 Mustang 5.0 - 8.89 @ 147.86

58. Karls East Coast Speed shop GT500 – 8.94 @ 154.35

59. Evolution – 8.991 @ 155.56 – 07 Built Iron Block w KB 2.8 (12/07/09 Atco Raceway)


 

Last edited by mobeydick; 05-12-2011 at 07:18 AM.
  #2  
Old 05-11-2011, 02:44 PM
3.8LMustang's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 2,107
Default

some fast *** cars/trucks
 
  #3  
Old 05-12-2011, 07:19 AM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

TTT For the changes.
 
  #4  
Old 05-12-2011, 08:32 AM
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,381
Default

That's is a pretty cool list. I am a little puzzled though, this is kind of a weird first post.
 
  #5  
Old 05-12-2011, 09:10 AM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

A little bit of the history of this list may be in order for the people that might wonder about that.

A few months ago the new Chevy ZL1 was introduced. Some of the LS Nutswingers over at the YB made all sorts of claims that it's the end of the line for Fords Dominance in the Muscle Car market place. One thing lead to another and some LShit Nutswinger [Jeff Taylor] produced a list of the Fastest LS powered cars and stated the Ford Modular could not compete. Mainly because no fastest Modular engine powered car list was available (that I knew of at the time). I took it upon myself to make one. Well guess what No LShit engine has ever run even close to 6.19 @ 235mph. An actually the top 5 (on Average) on the Mod motor list is faster then the top five (on Average) then the LShit engine powered cars. Although the LShit powered cars all have Aftermarket Blocks, Heads and Cranks. Whereas most the Modular powered car have Ford Production Stock Blocks Cranks and Heads.

There are 87 LShit powered cars that run or have run 8.999 or quicker on his list. I’m just trying to make a list that is comparable. If you know of any 8.999 Ford Modular Engine Family, be it 2/3/4valve please post it up.


I've posted this on 5 or 6 other boards also.
 
  #6  
Old 05-12-2011, 09:22 AM
3.8LMustang's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 2,107
Default

new 2012 Camaro ZL1 making around 550hp

of course they have to add a supercharger to beat the 5.0 mustang, lol
 
  #7  
Old 05-15-2011, 10:37 AM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

Ford Modular ¼ mile ET Quick list all time, feel free to add more if you know of any: updated 5.15.2011

1. John Mihovetz (Accufab) - 6.193 @ 235 - ( Mustang TUBE CHASSIS, 4V 4.6, LENCO – TWIN TURBO )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86uLwXstuWQ&feature=player_embedded

2. Gary Soulages - 6.93 @ 209 - 283ci 76mmTT – Truck http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oROLe_Ns590

3. MMR – 6.991 @ 205 - (Not a Chassis Car) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYAVHiEKdYg

4. JR Granatelli - 7.27 @ 190.00 - ( MUSTANG TUBE CHASSIS 5.4 4V LENCO - TURBO )

5. Jason Wilkerson - 7.49 @ 177 - 330ci TT - Truck

6. Andy Manson – 7.625 @ 181 - 4.6 325ci superchargerd combo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOvEn...ature=youtu.be

7. Joey Bridge – 7.73 @ 186 - (5.4L - Single Turbo - 3200 lbs - Glide - 275's - stock suspension)

8. Manny (HPP Racing) – 7.78 @ 181 - ( 4.6 Stroker 1999 COBRA GLIDE – SINGLE 98MM TURBO )

9. Daniel Pechar– 7.80 @ 181 -Triangle Speed

10. Dana Cook 7.85 @ 177.35 - MMR built TT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcCmxgDONbc&feature=youtu.be

11. TOXIC281 – 7.89 @ 176

12. Evolution Performance - 7.89 @ 175 - TT 5.4 (Not a Chassis car) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KMxv-lu_Wk

13. Dave Guy (viperred96gy) – 7.91 @ 182 325ci

14. Eric Leeper – 7.93 @ 175 - 331ci TT – Truck

15. Andrew “Junker” Barrale 7.95 @ 174.3 - 4.6 F1-R 3375# Mustang

16. Randy Haywood - 7.97 @ 188.00 - ( 4V 5.4 POWER GLIDE - TURBO )

17. John Kolivas – 7.99 @ 180

18. Bridge Racing - 7.99 @ 176 - (4.6L - GT4788 - glide - Stock suspension)
19. Steven Biggs Millington – 8.086 @ 177.93 330ci Would like more information
20. Mark Luton - 8.02 @ 176 - 5.4 turbo Stock Suspension
21. Johnny “Lightning” Wiker - 8.02 @ 169 - 358ci TT – Truck
22. MMR - 8.02 @ 176 - 5.4 single stock Suspension
23. LoProRaceCars - 8.15 @ 176
24. Bart Tobener – 8.15 @ 170.58 – 336ci – 4v with V7 YSi-Trim (Krugan Performance)
25. Carl Tasca – 8.18 @ 167.74 - 1.27/60’ 2010CJ
26. Ronnie Diaz - 8.18 @ 165mph - NMRA #6 1999 Mustang GT 4V
27. Brian Tutten - 8.20 @ ??
28. Greg1320 (racers edge) - 8.24 @ 170 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3NxV7d_OM4
29. Barry Burich – 8.29 @ ??? 283ci - Would like more Information
30. Steve Cooper - 8.30 @ 162 mph - (Accufab Engine, Whipple 3.4, Lightning)
31. Tim Palmer - 8.30 @ 162.00 - ( 1998 COBRA - TURBO )
32. Dave King - 8.32 @ 168 - ( 1997 COBRA POWER GLIDE - F2M )
33. blownstang01 - 8.39 @ 166
34. ninesecsnake - 8.40 @ 173
35. Vinny Barber - 8.44 @ 164
36. Allgo - 8.47 @ 163
37. Robert Fortin - 8.46 @ 165 - JPC Built Twin 67 mm 3600#s 3v
38. Roy Hill 8.47 @ 161 - Ford Racing 2010 Cobra Jet EngineJDM Engineering
39. Chris Crown - 8.47 @ 160.00 - ( 2000 GT PG - TURBO )
40. Justin Burcham – 8.48 @ 165 - 322ci 3 Valve Mustang 3605#s
41. Bob Cook – 8.48 @ 162 – 302ci – 4v with V7 YSi-Trim
42. Dominic Gabriel – 8.50 @ 170 – 298ci Livernois Stroker 4V in a Fox Body
43. Eddie Rios - 8.501 @163.8 - Single GT47-80, TH400, 2000 mustang GT 281" 4V
44. ModMont - 8.52 @ 162 – 323” 3v FR1
45. Jason Borum 8.52 @ 162 – 281 – 4v - Twin 67mm Trubos Fox Body Coupe
46. Bob Trinanes - 8.56 @ 170.00 - ( COBRA - PAXTON, COG DRIVE, HOGAN INTAKE, SP )
47. Aaron Archer - 8.57 @ 160.00 - ( 2003 COBRA C4 - BLOWER )
48. Reggie Burnett - 8.60 @ 159
49. Daniel Akre (2v mmr engine) - 8.60 @ 160
50. Shawn Byrne - 8.62 @ 163 – Turbo 2 Valve 1999 GT
51. Frank Yee – 8.65 @ 158.89 03 - Cobra
52. Jack Pedro 8.67 @ 160 - 4V Turbo
53. Joe Stewart - 8.70 @ 160.00 - ( 1998 COBRA - PAXTON, COG DRIVE, HCI LOWER, SP )
54. JRS Blown Snake - 8.72 @ 154.04 - w/ 1.25, 60 foot / (Blower only. 3.4 Whipple)
55. Chris Escobar – 8.773 @ 156.60 281ci Would like more information
56. Jason Shaw - 8.85 @ 155
57. Turbo Cobra – 8.85 @ 155 - (GT4780)
58. Casey Brown – 8.87 @ 151 - 331ci 67mm TT
59. Evolution - 8.89 @ 159.81 – Stock GT500 engine with Twin Turbos (08/09/08 Atco Racway)
60. Evolution 2011 Mustang 5.0 - 8.89 @ 147.86
61. Karls East Coast Speed shop GT500 – 8.94 @ 154.35
62. Evolution – 8.991 @ 155.56 – 07 Built Iron Block w KB 2.8 (12/07/09 Atco Raceway)
If there are mistakes please point them out! If you happen to know any of the people/owner/car that need updating please post it up!
 
  #8  
Old 05-15-2011, 03:14 PM
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,381
Default

Oh That makes more sense. If he takes this down the road of the fastest nitrous cars it won't end very favorably for you.
 
  #9  
Old 05-15-2011, 06:36 PM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

My point in the YB Thread was the GM LS engine platform was inferior to the Ford Modular Engine platform. The high HP LS Engine (750hp and above) are not true GM Engines. Anytime you want to build one over 750hp you will need a LSX or aftermarket Block, Heads, Crank and just about everything else to make it live at that high of a hp rating! They are always making claims that well you have to boost the 281 or 330 ci modular to get that kind of power. The facts are you have to do that with any small displacement engine to get that kind of power. The facts are the 434 bored and stroked GM LS platform can’t make that kind of power with larger displacement and live.
 
  #10  
Old 05-15-2011, 06:57 PM
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,381
Default

Originally Posted by mobeydick
My point in the YB Thread was the GM LS engine platform was inferior to the Ford Modular Engine platform. The high HP LS Engine (750hp and above) are not true GM Engines. Anytime you want to build one over 750hp you will need a LSX or aftermarket Block, Heads, Crank and just about everything else to make it live at that high of a hp rating! They are always making claims that well you have to boost the 281 or 330 ci modular to get that kind of power. The facts are you have to do that with any small displacement engine to get that kind of power. The facts are the 434 bored and stroked GM LS platform can’t make that kind of power with larger displacement and live.
I have a real appreciation for both engine platforms. I am pretty sure the LQ9, LS7, & LS9 blocks are all capable of very similar power levels as the strongest production modular blocks. The modular engines perform VERY well under boost due to their overhead cam designs and lighter valvetrain being able to rev sky high. The LS engines are great for NA and nitrous build due to their HUGE displacement capabilities and ridiculously high flowing heads. The L92 heads are dirt cheap and offer flow numbers that a lot of big block heads can't match. If I were to build an engine without any budget restraint I might go with a boosted mod motor but if there were any budget constraints the LS series would definitely be my choice.

I will say I did see more low 8 second street cars at the NMRA nationals than I did at the LsX shootout that was held at the same track just two weeks later.
 

Last edited by whitestang04; 05-15-2011 at 06:59 PM.
  #11  
Old 05-15-2011, 08:19 PM
drag_racer33's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 620
Default

I'll have to try to remember to talk to them at the next race, but there is a 00 281 twin turbo that has been way down into the 6s and well over 200. I dont know about now but last time I talked to them they were the fastest 281 in the world
 
  #12  
Old 05-16-2011, 03:44 AM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by whitestang04
I have a real appreciation for both engine platforms. I am pretty sure the LQ9, LS7, & LS9 blocks are all capable of very similar power levels as the strongest production modular blocks. The modular engines perform VERY well under boost due to their overhead cam designs and lighter valvetrain being able to rev sky high. The LS engines are great for NA and nitrous build due to their HUGE displacement capabilities and ridiculously high flowing heads. The L92 heads are dirt cheap and offer flow numbers that a lot of big block heads can't match. If I were to build an engine without any budget restraint I might go with a boosted mod motor but if there were any budget constraints the LS series would definitely be my choice.

I will say I did see more low 8 second street cars at the NMRA nationals than I did at the LsX shootout that was held at the same track just two weeks later.
I Edited it, it was late Sunday.

My point in the YB Thread was the GM LS engine platform from the factory is inferior to the Ford Modular Engine platform from the factory. The high HP LS Engine (750hp and above) are not true GM Engines. Anytime you want to build one over 750hp you will need a LSX or aftermarket Block, Heads, Crank and just about everything else to make it live at that high of a hp rating! They are always making claims that well you have to boost the 281 or 330 ci modular to get that kind of power. The facts are you have to do that with any small displacement engine to get that kind of power. The facts are a boosted, bored and stroked 434 GM LS platform can’t make that kind of power even with larger displacement and live.

It was late sunday
 

Last edited by mobeydick; 05-16-2011 at 03:52 AM.
  #13  
Old 05-16-2011, 03:52 AM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by drag_racer33
I'll have to try to remember to talk to them at the next race, but there is a 00 281 twin turbo that has been way down into the 6s and well over 200. I dont know about now but last time I talked to them they were the fastest 281 in the world
The only other person I know of that has went -7s is Steve Matusek with the Arrowmotive car. He sold that Car to John Mihovetz. John has made some changes to the car, he runs a 4.6 instead of a 5.4. But it is the Fastest that I know of. I have debated on putting his name on the list also. I don’t know if that would be fare to MMR and several others that have sold Fast cars.
 
  #14  
Old 05-16-2011, 03:24 PM
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,381
Default

Originally Posted by mobeydick
I Edited it, it was late Sunday.

My point in the YB Thread was the GM LS engine platform from the factory is inferior to the Ford Modular Engine platform from the factory. The high HP LS Engine (750hp and above) are not true GM Engines. Anytime you want to build one over 750hp you will need a LSX or aftermarket Block, Heads, Crank and just about everything else to make it live at that high of a hp rating! They are always making claims that well you have to boost the 281 or 330 ci modular to get that kind of power. The facts are you have to do that with any small displacement engine to get that kind of power. The facts are a boosted, bored and stroked 434 GM LS platform can’t make that kind of power even with larger displacement and live.

It was late sunday
I guess I just don't see the point of your argument. If you want to make that kind of power you have to modify things for either platform. They are both great engines if you ask me. You just sound like a total Ford or modular fanboy. That's fine and rock on.
 
  #15  
Old 05-16-2011, 04:19 PM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by whitestang04
I guess I just don't see the point of your argument. If you want to make that kind of power you have to modify things for either platform. They are both great engines if you ask me. You just sound like a total Ford or modular fanboy. That's fine and rock on.
I don't think I'm Total Modular Fanboy, Although I do like and use Ford Trucks in my Business. I do that for a reason. I use to be a Total GM fanboy. I drove GM products for 20 years and over that time I had so many problems with them in 2001 I decided to try Fords. Over the last 10 years I have had almost no issues with my Ford Vehicles. My Dad and his dad were GM people.

As far as Ford Modular vs. GM LS platforms I think it’s clear which is the better product from the factory and which one can take the most abuse with the factory parts. I know from an engineering standpoint the Ford Modular engine is more efficient.
 
  #16  
Old 05-16-2011, 05:14 PM
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,381
Default

Originally Posted by mobeydick
I don't think I'm Total Modular Fanboy, Although I do like and use Ford Trucks in my Business. I do that for a reason. I use to be a Total GM fanboy. I drove GM products for 20 years and over that time I had so many problems with them in 2001 I decided to try Fords. Over the last 10 years I have had almost no issues with my Ford Vehicles. My Dad and his dad were GM people.

As far as Ford Modular vs. GM LS platforms I think it’s clear which is the better product from the factory and which one can take the most abuse with the factory parts. I know from an engineering standpoint the Ford Modular engine is more efficient.
I grew up around GM muscle and slowly went the way of Ford on my own. Nine times out of ten I'd chose a Ford over a GM product.

As for your debate, I'd rather see which one is more dependable. How many miles does the average well maintained mod motor last compared to an equally maintained LS engine. When you start comparing power capabilities neither will remain stock so it becomes an argument of which upgrades are "better" which will always be based on opinion. The GM guys apparently have no problem sinking the coin into a built bottom end whereas the Ford guys don't have a problem spending their money on power adders.
 
  #17  
Old 05-16-2011, 06:45 PM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by whitestang04
I grew up around GM muscle and slowly went the way of Ford on my own. Nine times out of ten I'd chose a Ford over a GM product.

As for your debate, I'd rather see which one is more dependable. How many miles does the average well maintained mod motor last compared to an equally maintained LS engine. When you start comparing power capabilities neither will remain stock so it becomes an argument of which upgrades are "better" which will always be based on opinion. The GM guys apparently have no problem sinking the coin into a built bottom end whereas the Ford guys don't have a problem spending their money on power adders.
Actually the GM people have to do both. Build from the ground up and add power adders to keep up! There is no stock LS heads that will produce 2,000 hp ported or not. The stock LS blocks and cranks will not either!
 
  #18  
Old 05-17-2011, 05:44 AM
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,381
Default

Originally Posted by mobeydick
Actually the GM people have to do both. Build from the ground up and add power adders to keep up! There is no stock LS heads that will produce 2,000 hp ported or not. The stock LS blocks and cranks will not either!
You're as stubborn as a mule. Have fun with your argument, I'm out.
 
  #19  
Old 05-17-2011, 08:51 AM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 3,719
Default

This thread is kinda dumb and boring.
 
  #20  
Old 05-17-2011, 09:20 AM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by 00blkstanggt
This thread is kinda dumb and boring.
Like the hundreds of threads this site has on a daily basis is any better!
 
  #21  
Old 05-17-2011, 03:58 PM
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,381
Default

Originally Posted by mobeydick
Like the hundreds of threads this site has on a daily basis is any better!
If you don't like it here then you are more than welcome to take your juvenile and argumentative thread elsewhere.
 
  #22  
Old 05-18-2011, 05:13 AM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by whitestang04
If you don't like it here then you are more than welcome to take your juvenile and argumentative thread elsewhere.
Better still you can put me on your ignore list as I wlll you and we will not have to see each others ****!
 

Last edited by mobeydick; 05-18-2011 at 05:38 AM.
  #23  
Old 05-18-2011, 05:50 AM
bigkeeko's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 322
Default

Originally Posted by mobeydick
Better still you can put me on your ignore list as I wlll you and we will not have to see each others ****!

The way you`re going no ****** will see any of your posts.
 
  #24  
Old 05-18-2011, 07:42 AM
mobeydick's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Simons Is. GA.
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by bigkeeko
The way you`re going no ****** will see any of your posts.
I clicked on New Post, all four including this one makes me real concerned about that!
 
  #25  
Old 05-18-2011, 09:25 AM
00blkstanggt's Avatar
Hot, Nasty, Bad ass speed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 3,719
Default

Originally Posted by mobeydick
Like the hundreds of threads this site has on a daily basis is any better!
Ha, that's funny if you think this site has hundreds of new threads on a daily basis. Nobody really sees the point of your thread. So your first post on here was about showing a running list of 1/4 mile times. Whoopie
 
  #26  
Old 05-18-2011, 04:29 PM
whitestang04's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,381
Default

Originally Posted by mobeydick
I clicked on New Post, all four including this one makes me real concerned about that!
Awwww. Is someone butt hurt that they don't have an army of immature ******** to back his silly argument over the interwebz?




Someone quote me in case he really put me on ignore
 
  #27  
Old 05-19-2011, 03:11 AM
stanger00's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pinole, Ca
Posts: 3,842
Default

I seen dana cook run faster than 177...her car has gone 181 but et was a 7.8.

No video or anything but I was there.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
96TangerineBossGT
Modular 4.6L Tech
0
01-31-2006 08:14 AM
B-rett
Drag Racing!
5
11-17-2005 06:21 PM
cobra4123
Drag Racing!
7
10-07-2005 05:24 AM
03stangblue
Modular 4.6L Tech
22
07-11-2005 08:39 AM
witestang
Modular 4.6L Tech
1
04-23-2005 11:54 AM



Quick Reply: Ford Modular ¼ mile ET Quick list all time



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:17 AM.