Stock HP, 1979-2004, question.
Found this on the web. Thought it was interesting, but i was suprised to see what it says about the 5.0's
According to this the 94/95 5.0's were the strongest with 240hp?? Is this at all accurate? I dont know much about the 5.0's but i used to have a roomate with one and he was always tellin me they have about 280-300hp stock. All he had done with his was an intake and offroad x-pipe and i remember that thing totally hauled ass. Does this look correct? HP ratings of the Fox-bodied V8 Mustangs 1979 5.0 2 bbl 140 hp 1980-81 4.2 2 bbl 120 hp 1982 5.0 2 bbl 157 4.2 (w/auto) 2 bbl 120 hp 1983 5.0 4 bbl 175 hp 1984 5.0 4 bbl 175 Throttle body FI (w/auto) 165 hp 1985 5.0 4 bbl 210 Throttle body FI (w/auto) 180 hp 1986 5.0 SEFI SD 200 hp 1987 5.0 SEFI SD 225 hp 1988 5.0 SEFI SD, MAF (Calif) 225 hp 1989-92 5.0 SEFI MAF 225 hp 1993 5.0 SEFI MAF 205hp 5.0 Cobra 1994-95 5.0 OHV 215hp @ 4200 / 5.0 OHV 240hp @ 4800 1996-97 4.6 SOHC 215hp @ 4400 / 4.6 DOHC 305hp @ 5800 1998 4.6 SOHC 225hp @ 4750 / 4.6 DOHC 305hp @ 5800 1999-02 4.6 SOHC 260hp @ 5250 /4.6 DOHC 320hp @ 6000 / Bullitt 4.6 SOHC 265hp @ 5250 MachI 4.6 DOHC 305hp @ 5800 2003-04 4.6 DOHC 390 @ 6000 |
Looks pretty accurate, stock 5.0's never had 280-300 stock.
|
So what is it that gives the 5.0's thier reputation?
Maybe my ex roomates was not stock. Dont talk to him much either. Kinda a dirtbag. So were they geared differently? They look smaller and lighter. Stock 2000-2004 GT vs. Stock 94/95 GT, who has the edge and why? |
Ditto. Those lists look right to me. Actually, I thought that 240 hp number on that cobra was only 230. But it is probably correct at 240 as the lists states.
|
2000-2004 have more power man. Not really a close race between them.
|
Originally Posted by slappy
So what is it that gives the 5.0's thier reputation?
Maybe my ex roomates was not stock. Dont talk to him much either. Kinda a dirtbag. So were they geared differently? They look smaller and lighter. Stock 2000-2004 GT vs. Stock 94/95 GT, who has the edge and why? |
Wow.
No kiddin..... I really diddnt expect that, with the way a lot of people talk about the 5.0's. Well, thanks to all of you for clarifying this to my ignorant ass. ROFL |
Originally Posted by slappy
So what is it that gives the 5.0's thier reputation?
Maybe my ex roomates was not stock. Dont talk to him much either. Kinda a dirtbag. So were they geared differently? They look smaller and lighter. Stock 2000-2004 GT vs. Stock 94/95 GT, who has the edge and why? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands