2001 gt dyno 265hp/307tq

stang01 · 03-12-2008, 10:27 AM

my first post here heh.

I will be posting the graph as soon as the dyno guy sends it to me he has some printing issues. But the car put down 265whp and 307wtq

i was very surprised and this is on a dyno that usually shows less compared to others.

The mods are: C&l intake, 75 mm TB, C&l plenum, O/R x pipe/ UD pulleys, oh and a good tuner.

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...deoID=29219168

tsumi88 · 03-12-2008, 10:40 AM

welcome!
post up some pics and that graph!
congrats!

zigzagg321 · 03-12-2008, 03:11 PM

hmmm, something sounds fishy. Modular Powerhouse tuned my car, and I have all but underdrives. Tim Barth himself dyno tuned my car and my best pull was 245HP and 288 TQ.

either you are lean as a mofo, or Im going to have to get some U/D pulles.

stang01 · 03-12-2008, 03:50 PM

i dont really know...it may be a factory freak cause it sure seems like it bone stock miles per hour in the 1/4 was 102 with intake it hit 103

heres a video of the dyno not clear enough to read tho
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...deoID=29219168

zigzagg321 · 03-12-2008, 04:47 PM

lucky you. I was told by Tim that mine was strong for what mods I had. I think Im gonna get some U/D's now anyway.

blownstang · 03-13-2008, 09:07 PM

Must be a super factory freak! Mine put down 266/300 SAE and 271/303 STD with full bolt ons. I'm trapping 102 miles per hour with a race weight of 3525lbs.

stangcharger · 03-14-2008, 07:53 AM

Great numbers man for those mods.

It also could be the time of year. I dyno best in febuary or sound then. not to humid and cool outside.

but yes on a side not 103mph is quite a bit more then i have seen stock ones trap. or even lightly modded.

congratz.

*03gtmustang* · 03-14-2008, 08:04 AM

What was your 60 ft. and 1/4 time when you hit 103? Is the graph STD or SAE?

stang01 · 03-14-2008, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 03gtmustang

What was your 60 ft. and 1/4 time when you hit 103? Is the graph STD or SAE?

I dont know if it was STD or SAE 1/4 time was 14.2 with 2.2 60 ft.

White04GT · 03-14-2008, 09:57 AM

so let's just say they were STD. SAE would put you around 260rwhp and 302rwtq still good for the mods you have. Get some long tubes and you should pick up another 10-15rwhp.

stang01 · 03-14-2008, 10:05 AM

ooooooo that sounds tempting... couple of questions about long tubes i have a x pipe, are there any that would fit them?? or they just bold right in?

White04GT · 03-14-2008, 10:08 AM

depends what kind of x pipe you have. I had a bassani o/r x pipe and it had clamps so when I got my headers I could remove the extra pipeing and have the headers fit.

stang01 · 03-14-2008, 10:11 AM

the brand is MAC

White04GT · 03-14-2008, 10:53 AM

You are going to have to purchase a mac shorty h pipe. Oh well mac products are cheap so there is really no loss there.

stang01 · 03-14-2008, 08:54 PM

just asked the dyno guy he said its SAE

GraphicNature · 04-01-2008, 09:38 AM

You guys with Long-tubes... Long-tubes on a car with just bolt-ons will lower your peak torque numbers. not saying it wont make more elsewhere in the range but they will lower your peak torque. Look at it this way. TQ is resistance thats why a 4v head will make a lot more HP but you can make more TQ with a 2V.

stang01 · 04-03-2008, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GraphicNature

You guys with Long-tubes... Long-tubes on a car with just bolt-ons will lower your peak torque numbers. not saying it wont make more elsewhere in the range but they will lower your peak torque. Look at it this way. TQ is resistance thats why a 4v head will make a lot more HP but you can make more TQ with a 2V.

ok but would it increase hp?

GraphicNature · 04-05-2008, 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stang01

ok but would the increase hp?

Mostly definitely will increase HP. I was just commenting on the fact about the TQ numbers being so different. They really wont increase HP that much unless you have cams or a power adder. They stock manifolds actually flow really well. case in point, Hellion uses stock manifolds with the turbo systems.

03-12-2008, 10:27 AM	#1 (permalink)
stang01 Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 67	2001 gt dyno 265hp/307tq my first post here heh. I will be posting the graph as soon as the dyno guy sends it to me he has some printing issues. But the car put down 265whp and 307wtq i was very surprised and this is on a dyno that usually shows less compared to others. The mods are: C&l intake, 75 mm TB, C&l plenum, O/R x pipe/ UD pulleys, oh and a good tuner. http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...deoID=29219168 Last edited by stang01 : 03-23-2008 at 05:07 PM.

03-12-2008, 10:40 AM	#2 (permalink)
tsumi88 THE ONLY DARK GREEN VERT Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: denver Posts: 460	welcome! post up some pics and that graph! congrats! __________________ -Paul "I can make computers survive aquatic conditions" Flowbots- handlebars 99 V6 vert AT CAI noob

03-12-2008, 03:50 PM	#4 (permalink)
stang01 Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 67	i dont really know...it may be a factory freak cause it sure seems like it bone stock miles per hour in the 1/4 was 102 with intake it hit 103 heres a video of the dyno not clear enough to read tho http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...deoID=29219168 Last edited by stang01 : 03-12-2008 at 04:02 PM.

03-13-2008, 09:07 PM	#6 (permalink)
blownstang Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 330	Must be a super factory freak! Mine put down 266/300 SAE and 271/303 STD with full bolt ons. I'm trapping 102 miles per hour with a race weight of 3525lbs. __________________ 2003 DSG Mustang GT 5spd Full Bolt On's, Full Suspension, Built Rear 271/303

03-14-2008, 07:53 AM	#7 (permalink)
stangcharger 500hp v6 Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 169	Great numbers man for those mods. It also could be the time of year. I dyno best in febuary or sound then. not to humid and cool outside. but yes on a side not 103mph is quite a bit more then i have seen stock ones trap. or even lightly modded. congratz. __________________ 4.2L forged v6 p-1sc www.hppmotorsports.com 436rwhp/378rwtq@15psi 19* 91oct+torco www.stangcharger.com

03-14-2008, 08:04 AM	#8 (permalink)
03gtmustang Super Moderator Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Northern Va Posts: 3,098	What was your 60 ft. and 1/4 time when you hit 103? Is the graph STD or SAE? __________________ D&D Auto Detailing -Dan

03-14-2008, 09:57 AM	#10 (permalink)
White04GT Procharged Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Kingwood, Tx. Posts: 904	so let's just say they were STD. SAE would put you around 260rwhp and 302rwtq still good for the mods you have. Get some long tubes and you should pick up another 10-15rwhp. __________________ 2004 White GT just another Procharged GT. 370rwhp/396rwtq 8#'s. Gator boots, with the pimped out gucci suit.

03-14-2008, 10:05 AM	#11 (permalink)
stang01 Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 67	ooooooo that sounds tempting... couple of questions about long tubes i have a x pipe, are there any that would fit them?? or they just bold right in? __________________ 2001 mustang gt 265rwhp/307rwtq c&l intake, 75m TB, c&l plenum, steeda UD pulleys,MAC x pipe, steeda short shifter, Nitto DR's, Ford Racing 4.10 gears, Dyno tune.

03-14-2008, 10:08 AM	#12 (permalink)
White04GT Procharged Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Kingwood, Tx. Posts: 904	depends what kind of x pipe you have. I had a bassani o/r x pipe and it had clamps so when I got my headers I could remove the extra pipeing and have the headers fit. __________________ 2004 White GT just another Procharged GT. 370rwhp/396rwtq 8#'s. Gator boots, with the pimped out gucci suit.

03-14-2008, 10:11 AM	#13 (permalink)
stang01 Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 67	the brand is MAC __________________ 2001 mustang gt 265rwhp/307rwtq c&l intake, 75m TB, c&l plenum, steeda UD pulleys,MAC x pipe, steeda short shifter, Nitto DR's, Ford Racing 4.10 gears, Dyno tune.

03-14-2008, 10:53 AM	#14 (permalink)
White04GT Procharged Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Kingwood, Tx. Posts: 904	You are going to have to purchase a mac shorty h pipe. Oh well mac products are cheap so there is really no loss there. __________________ 2004 White GT just another Procharged GT. 370rwhp/396rwtq 8#'s. Gator boots, with the pimped out gucci suit.

03-14-2008, 08:54 PM	#15 (permalink)
stang01 Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 67	just asked the dyno guy he said its SAE __________________ 2001 mustang gt 265rwhp/307rwtq c&l intake, 75m TB, c&l plenum, steeda UD pulleys,MAC x pipe, steeda short shifter, Nitto DR's, Ford Racing 4.10 gears, Dyno tune. Last edited by stang01 : 03-15-2008 at 06:48 PM.

04-01-2008, 09:38 AM	#16 (permalink)
GraphicNature Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 6	You guys with Long-tubes... Long-tubes on a car with just bolt-ons will lower your peak torque numbers. not saying it wont make more elsewhere in the range but they will lower your peak torque. Look at it this way. TQ is resistance thats why a 4v head will make a lot more HP but you can make more TQ with a 2V.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode