first dyno

B-rett · 03-25-2007, 01:29 PM

Well my car put down 265 rwhp and 288rwtq on a very conservative 87 octane tune

mods:
vt stage 2 cams
bbk cai
flowmaster 40's
mac o/r h pipe
4.10's
and of course the tune from big shot dyno, i would post the papers but there at home and im at college

B-rett · 03-26-2007, 08:16 AM

i see everyone is just speachless by these numbers lol

stanger00 · 03-26-2007, 08:29 AM

why didnt you get multiple octane tunes.....

seems like a waste since you have cams that can get you up to 300 hp.

r3dn3ck · 03-26-2007, 08:43 AM

considering it's a 87 octane tune that's not bad power at all. Post up your graph!

B-rett · 03-26-2007, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stanger00

why didnt you get multiple octane tunes.....

seems like a waste since you have cams that can get you up to 300 hp.

well for one im not gettin near 300 until i get headers and more bolts ons

two.... i didnt feel like paying more money for gas on my daily driver im only 19 i need some spending money

three... i got a real conservative tune so i dont have to spend my spending money on fixing the car

four....i dont realy take it to the track i just want a strong street car so the few extra hp i would get out of a higher octane didnt really matter to me

and ill have my brother post the graphs if he can im back at college till may 1sy

Mug11 · 03-26-2007, 12:05 PM

mustang dyno or dynomometer?

Not too bad. Long tubes will wake it up drastically!

B-rett · 03-26-2007, 12:35 PM

mustang dyno and i am considering headers for next mod since i do have access to a lift but im not sure i wanna go through that

if i got headers would i need retuned right away or would it be ok to drive on my current tune

csledd · 03-26-2007, 07:58 PM

I'd definitely go with headers next.. it'll help a ton I do believe. And not bad at all for a mustang dyno

Btw.. I run 93 octane with my cams.. have been for over year without a single problem

B-rett · 03-26-2007, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by csledd

I'd definitely go with headers next.. it'll help a ton I do believe. And not bad at all for a mustang dyno

Btw.. I run 93 octane with my cams.. have been for over year without a single problem

i wasnt afraid on problems with the 93 octane i was afraid of gas prices, i was afraid of a aggresive tune making problems so i did what i felt comfortable with, 87 octane and a conservative tune

and csledd headers have a good chance of coming next im coming after your 297rwhp or whatever you have lol

csledd · 03-26-2007, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B-rett

i wasnt afraid on problems with the 93 octane i was afraid of gas prices, i was afraid of a aggresive tune making problems so i did what i felt comfortable with, 87 octane and a conservative tune

and csledd headers have a good chance of coming next im coming after your 297rwhp or whatever you have lol

lol go for it.. I have a friend with very similar mods as mine take his car to my tuner and they worked with the tune ALL day trying to beat my numbers. They were unsuccessful

but if you were to beat mine i'd totally bow down to you.. because that's just awesome numbers for any 4.6 NA with just some basic bolt ons and the cams

B-rett · 03-28-2007, 10:09 AM

ehhhh im not worried about it lol

BrentK · 04-01-2007, 07:37 PM

Nice numbers..

Im going up to BSD in a couple weeks

*Lances03SVT* · 04-01-2007, 08:11 PM

Nice number's.I would at least go with a 91 tune though.

B-rett · 04-02-2007, 10:32 AM

when i get higher in power ill go with a 91 octane tune but for what i have i didnt realy care to pay more for gas this summer

03-25-2007, 01:29 PM	#1 (permalink)
B-rett BMC Member# 03209 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: north ridgeville, ohio Posts: 1,637	first dyno Well my car put down 265 rwhp and 288rwtq on a very conservative 87 octane tune mods: vt stage 2 cams bbk cai flowmaster 40's mac o/r h pipe 4.10's and of course the tune from big shot dyno, i would post the papers but there at home and im at college __________________ ---35th Anniversary--- 265 rwhp 288 rwtq

03-26-2007, 08:16 AM	#2 (permalink)
B-rett BMC Member# 03209 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: north ridgeville, ohio Posts: 1,637	i see everyone is just speachless by these numbers lol __________________ ---35th Anniversary--- 265 rwhp 288 rwtq

03-26-2007, 12:05 PM	#6 (permalink)
Mug11 Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Lubbock/Houston, TX Posts: 908	mustang dyno or dynomometer? Not too bad. Long tubes will wake it up drastically! __________________

03-26-2007, 12:35 PM	#7 (permalink)
B-rett BMC Member# 03209 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: north ridgeville, ohio Posts: 1,637	mustang dyno and i am considering headers for next mod since i do have access to a lift but im not sure i wanna go through that if i got headers would i need retuned right away or would it be ok to drive on my current tune __________________ ---35th Anniversary--- 265 rwhp 288 rwtq

03-26-2007, 07:58 PM	#8 (permalink)
csledd DSG!!! Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Paducah, KY Posts: 3,074	I'd definitely go with headers next.. it'll help a ton I do believe. And not bad at all for a mustang dyno Btw.. I run 93 octane with my cams.. have been for over year without a single problem __________________ CAP DSG Registry 2003 Mustang GT - daily driven check out my cardomain for more info 296 rwhp / 310 rwtq Money spent @ AM: $4623.20 1984 Mustang Hatch - low budget project

03-26-2007, 08:43 AM	#4 (permalink)
r3dn3ck Wowbagger hates me too! Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Magrathea/California Posts: 6,702	considering it's a 87 octane tune that's not bad power at all. Post up your graph!

03-28-2007, 10:09 AM	#11 (permalink)
B-rett BMC Member# 03209 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: north ridgeville, ohio Posts: 1,637	ehhhh im not worried about it lol __________________ ---35th Anniversary--- 265 rwhp 288 rwtq

04-01-2007, 07:37 PM	#12 (permalink)
BrentK Win it or wreck it Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: My Heart is in Ohio Posts: 1,282	Nice numbers.. Im going up to BSD in a couple weeks __________________ 2003 GT

04-01-2007, 08:11 PM	#13 (permalink)
Lances03SVT Super Moderator Join Date: May 2005 Location: Carthage, Missouri Posts: 9,194	Nice number's.I would at least go with a 91 tune though. __________________ _______________________ 2003 Cobra SOLD

04-02-2007, 10:32 AM	#14 (permalink)
B-rett BMC Member# 03209 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: north ridgeville, ohio Posts: 1,637	when i get higher in power ill go with a 91 octane tune but for what i have i didnt realy care to pay more for gas this summer __________________ ---35th Anniversary--- 265 rwhp 288 rwtq

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode