Different dynos,,??? results
Ok guys, ease my mind w/this one. January I did a dyno on my car w/very minimal mods (UD pullies, mac shorties, mac hi flow cat h pipe, borla xhaust and k-n air filter.) and results were 216 HP. This was on a Dyno-Jet Dynamometer.
Fast fwd to last Sunday and I dyno'd again w/the same parts except for addition of CAI, UD pullies/short belt bypassing smog pump and off road H pipe. Results: 237 on first pull and 240 on second. Thats a +21-24 Hp jump. BTW: This was on a Mustang Dynomometer (thats what it said at top of the sheet.) I know I should have gone back to the same place as last dyno instead of using two difft pieces of equipment. Are the addition of these parts REALLY worth that much? |
actully bypassing ther smog with short belt and using off road h-pipe i could see it being close to 15-20rwhp. but yeah the mustang one reads higher i belive or is it lower? i forget i have been studying for finals.
|
the smog system removal was my most recent mod on my car and everything i read about it said that the gains were minimal to none.but i'll tell you that i felt a big difference after i did it.if you went from cats to no cats that was probably where most of your jump came from.i dont know about the dyno equipment difference.
|
I guess it goes both ways,,the dyno jet dyno could have been a little low too. Who knows, I was just wondering. Thnx for the input everyone. Next trick will be to get Long tubes Pro Chamber H and Flowmaster cat back. These can be used on the new engine when I decide to get going. Lets see if I can break 260 w/just bolt ons.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:30 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands