WoW....
Judge Judy needs to learn how to speak properly, and in a manner fitting of a Judge. I can tell you that if I was the defendant the next thing I would do is sue Judith for deformation of character.
eBay has already dealt with this via the notorious 'xBox BOX 360' scandal and all that eBay could do is reimburse the buyer and ban the seller..
If the item description stated "This is a photo only" then the judge was wrong in this case.. You can describe the phone in full detail as long as it states in the actual item description (in the 'Item Description' table) that it is only a photo.
Now I think that the defendant was a scammer and shouldn't be allowed to sell anything ever again, but the judgement was wrong.. Plain and simple...
